The second set of misinformation involves conspiracy theories about the origin and spread of COVID-19. 15 - 19 Discussions of a COVID-19 vaccine reignited the anti-vaccination movement. 13, 14 Medical professionals and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) were criticized for denying the preventive and/or curative powers of hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin or the effectiveness of ingesting bleach or colloidal silver.
10 - 12 Homeopathic remedies (e.g., sunshine and Vitamin D), it was argued, could boost the immune system and prevent a person from catching COVID-19. 9 Critics of this expertise contended that the pandemic was to be no more serious than the seasonal flu and would simply disappear, either naturally, through herd immunity, or by miraculous causes. The first set involves claims that statements made by public health experts and scientists were inaccurate. We classify pandemic misinformation broadly into two sets of ideas. This study indicates that the religion effects can appear early, giving time for health education specialists to address them, and that these effects can diminish once preventive measures are available. Faith communities are not always receptive to public health messages that promote the public good. The study confirmed higher use of social media among non-Hispanic Roman Catholics but did not find this relationship among Hispanic Protestants. Black Protestants showed a higher level of use and trust in state and local government officials. Among White nonevangelical Protestants and non-Hispanic Roman Catholics, there was found the same combination of a higher likelihood of reliance on messages from the Donald Trump Presidency and a lower likelihood for news-media use. In the survey research, small, uniquely religious effects were found with White evangelical receptivity of COVID-19 information from Donald Trump and less reliance on information from public health experts, and small, uniquely religious associations were found with preventive measures. Religious themes fell below the 15% threshold once the vaccine was available. The framing of COVID-19 using religious language was associated with the Christian right in about half of the religiously-themed posts. Prior to the availability of vaccines, religious themes consistently appeared in 15–19% of COVID-19 social media posts and were higher in subsets of the discourse tied to misinformation. The association of White evangelicals with politicized misinformation was consistent across all three small studies. Next, secondary quantitative analysis of two recent surveys from the American Trends Panels by Pew Research conducted in April 2020 (N = 9482) and February 2021 (N = 9429) were conducted to determine whether sources of information and preventive behaviors related to the pandemic were associated with uniquely religious effects or possibly mediated by other factors such as sociodemographic characteristics or political views. First, we engaged in the automated text mining of approximately 2.3 million discussion posts from discussion forums noted for their conspiracism and extremism.
This study conducted three small analyses approach. The purpose of this study is to identify the receptivity to and spread of misinformation about COVID-19 by faith communities and whether embracing these inaccuracies constitutes a uniquely religious effect. However, with the onset of the coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19), there is concern that religious communities may be echo chambers for misinformation and conspiracy theories that are undercutting the adoption of precautions to prevent transmission and the use of COVID-19 vaccines. Faith communities support a variety of public health initiatives as conduits of information and service distribution points.
0 kommentar(er)
